off label.
Filters
Year range
charts re-slice where a pre-computed view exists

Medical errors

Does a hospital safety grade actually predict whether you survive, or is it a paperwork score?

Hospital-acquired infections have mostly fallen well below their 2015 baseline, but two measures remain above it (abdominal hysterectomy surgical-site infections and ventilator-associated events), and Leapfrog A grades sat in a flat 29 to 34 percent band for eight years before a Spring 2026 jump that a methodology change partly explains.

Question

The problem

Patient safety remains a national hospital-performance problem because preventable harm varies by facility and service line while accountability systems often diffuse responsibility. Infection control, safety grades, and penalty programs show that the sector has measurable signals, but they are not always tied to a disciplined improvement operating model.

The recommendation

Run safety improvement as a facility-level performance turnaround program. The recommended approach is to prioritize low-performing hospitals and worsening infection types, align penalties with harm reduction, and require transparent measurement that connects safety grades to patient outcomes.

How safe is the stay?

The grade the typical hospital earns, whether it is improving, and which harms are winning or losing.

39%
Hospitals earning a Leapfrog A safety grade, Spring 2026
31 percent earn a B and 27 percent a C. Spring 2026 is the first cycle to exclude 450 non-participating hospitals from grading, which lifts the graded A-share above its long-standing 29 to 34 percent band.
2.5%
Hospitals stuck at a D or F safety grade, Spring 2026
2.3 percent at D plus 0.2 percent at F, down from 7.4 percent in Spring 2024, but part of that drop reflects the 450 non-participating hospitals now held out as Grade Not Assigned.
1.112
2024 standardized infection ratio for abdominal hysterectomy surgical-site infection, the worst of two measures above baseline
Hysterectomy SSI is 11.2 percent above the 2015 benchmark and still climbing. Ventilator-associated events sit at 1.105, above baseline but falling since a 2021 COVID-era peak. C. difficile is down 62.5 percent.

Leapfrog hospital safety grades, Spring 2026

Share of the 2,363 graded general acute-care hospitals at each letter grade, the most recent Spring 2026 cycle.

Read it this way The 27 percent of hospitals at a C, plus the 2.5 percent at D or F, sit below the 39 percent that earn an A, the first cycle in which A is the single largest grade. Read the A-share against the caveat: Spring 2026 is also the first cycle to hold 450 non-participating hospitals out as Grade Not Assigned, which shrinks the graded pool and lifts every grade share, so this is not cleanly comparable to earlier cycles. Use this chart to identify the safety signal being measured and why the recommendation prioritizes facility-level improvement, infection control, and outcome-linked accountability.

Caveat Spring 2026 excluded 450 hospitals that did not participate in the 2024 or 2025 Leapfrog survey (Grade Not Assigned), a new category. Shares here are of the 2,363 hospitals actually graded, so the jump in the A-share versus earlier cycles partly reflects this denominator change, not only real improvement. Separately, the avoidable-death and 160,000-deaths estimates tied to these grades (see the risk chart) are contested modeled figures disputed in the patient-safety literature, not a single settled number.

0.0% 12.5% 25.0% 37.5% 50.0% A 38.8% B 31.3% C 27.3% D 2.3% F 0.2%
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
Safety gradeShare of graded hospitals (percent)
A38.8
B31.3
C27.3
D2.3
F0.2

Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade, Spring 2026 · Spring 2026 · source

Leapfrog safety-grade shares by cycle, Spring 2018 to Spring 2026

Percent of graded hospitals at each letter grade, every cycle. Use the Grade picker to isolate one line. The A-share held a flat 29 to 34 percent band for eight years before the Spring 2026 jump.

Read it this way For eight years no grade share moved much: A stayed in a 29 to 34 percent band and C led the field. Spring 2026 breaks that pattern, with A rising to 39 percent and C and D falling sharply, but the caveat matters: that cycle first excluded 450 non-participating hospitals as Grade Not Assigned, which mechanically lifts every remaining share. Treat Spring 2026 as a possible turn, not yet confirmed real improvement. Use this chart to identify the safety signal being measured and why the recommendation prioritizes facility-level improvement, infection control, and outcome-linked accountability.

Caveat Each point is the share of hospitals graded that cycle (Leapfrog grades twice a year). Spring 2026 is the first cycle to exclude 450 non-participating hospitals as Grade Not Assigned. Because those hospitals leave the graded denominator, the Spring 2026 rise in A and drop in C, D, and F partly reflect the denominator change rather than only genuine improvement.

0.0% 12.5% 25.0% 37.5% 50.0% S18F19S21F22S24F25S26 ABCDF GRADING CYCLE SHARE OF GRADED HOSPITALS (PERCENT)
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
CycleABCDF
Spring 201830.327.635.55.80.9
Fall 201832.324.136.86.20.6
Spring 201931.82635.86.10.3
Fall 201933.324.8347.50.3
Spring 202033.125.234.56.70.5
Fall 202034.124.134.76.50.6
Spring 202133.124.135.470.4
Fall 20213226.134.76.50.7
Spring 202232.823.935.96.80.6
Fall 202229.527.536.16.40.5
Spring 202329.125.938.660.4
Fall 202329.624.139.36.60.4
Spring 202429.125.937.27.40.4
Fall 202432.124.236.270.5
Spring 202532.124.435.47.40.7
Fall 202531.926.133.280.8
Spring 2026 (excl. GNA)38.831.327.32.30.2

Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade, cycle Explanation-of-Safety-Grades files · Spring 2026 · source

Hospital infection rates since the 2015 baseline

Each line is a standardized infection ratio (SIR). A value of 1.0 equals the 2015 national baseline. Below 1.0 is better than baseline. Use the Infection measure picker to isolate one line.

Read it this way Five of the seven lines trend well below the 1.0 baseline, led by C. difficile at 0.375. Two remain above it in 2024: SSI hysterectomy, which reversed after 2019 and climbed to 1.112, and ventilator-associated events (VAE), which spiked to 1.461 in the 2021 COVID surge and has fallen back to 1.105 but is still above baseline. The 2020 to 2021 bumps across most lines line up with the noted COVID-19 disruption, so read that stretch as a pandemic-driven anomaly rather than a change in underlying practice. Use this chart to identify the safety signal being measured and why the recommendation prioritizes facility-level improvement, infection control, and outcome-linked accountability.

Caveat MRSA and C. difficile entered CMS scoring in FY2017. VAE annual SIRs are from the CDC AR&PS data portal (the progress-report page shows VAE only as a year-over-year percent change). All series use the 2015 national baseline and are shown from 2015 = 1.0 for comparability. The 2020 and 2021 spikes reflect COVID-19 disruption.

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 201520172019202120232024 SSI hysterectomyVAESSI colonMRSACLABSICAUTIC. difficile YEAR STANDARDIZED INFECTION RATIO
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
YearCLABSICAUTIMRSAC. difficileSSI colonSSI hysterectomyVAE
20151111111
20160.8910.930.9350.9210.9330.8740.98
20170.8140.880.8620.8040.9060.890.952
20180.7390.8090.840.7110.8870.9380.947
20190.6890.7410.8170.5830.8550.9790.967
20200.8570.7540.9410.5180.810.8921.301
20210.9210.7951.070.5010.8310.9931.461
20220.8360.6970.9040.4840.8580.9511.188
20230.7240.6210.7550.420.8791.0311.131
20240.660.5590.7030.3750.8451.1121.105

CDC NHSN Annual SIR, Acute Care Hospitals · 2024 · source

Infection rates by type, 2024

Standardized infection ratio in 2024. A value of 1.0 is the 2015 baseline. Two measures sit above it: abdominal hysterectomy surgical-site infection and ventilator-associated events.

Read it this way Two bars cross the 1.0 reference line: SSI hysterectomy at 1.112 and ventilator-associated events (VAE) at 1.105, while every other type sits below baseline, led by C. difficile at 0.375. This single-year snapshot shows which measures are currently worst. The trend chart alongside it shows that hysterectomy infections drifted above baseline over time while VAE spiked during COVID and is now falling back. Use this chart to identify the safety signal being measured and why the recommendation prioritizes facility-level improvement, infection control, and outcome-linked accountability.

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 SSI hysterectomy 1.112 1.1 VAE 1.105 1.1 SSI colon 0.845 0.8 MRSA 0.703 0.7 CLABSI 0.660 0.7 CAUTI 0.559 0.6 C. difficile 0.375 0.4 2015 baseline (SIR = 1.0)
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
Infection type2024 standardized infection ratio
SSI hysterectomy1.112
VAE1.105
SSI colon0.845
MRSA0.703
CLABSI0.66
CAUTI0.559
C. difficile0.375

CDC NHSN Annual SIR, Acute Care Hospitals · 2024 · source

Does it matter, and does the system respond?

Whether the grade predicts survival, and whether Medicare's penalties bite the worst hospitals or just punish a fixed share every year.

160,000
Estimated avoidable deaths a year linked to hospital safety, a contested modeled figure
About 50,000 lives could be saved if every hospital matched an A grade.
$4.4B
Cumulative Medicare readmission penalties, FY2013 to FY2022
Plus HACRP infection penalties of about 373 million dollars in FY2015 and 430 million in FY2017.

Avoidable-death risk by safety grade, relative to A hospitals

Percent greater avoidable-death risk versus an A hospital. A hospitals are the zero-percent baseline. The gradient is monotone from B to D or F.

Read it this way The jump from B at 35 percent to C at 88 percent is much larger than the step from C to D or F at 92 percent, so the modeled risk increase is concentrated between B and C grades, not spread evenly. Because these are the same contested Leapfrog and Johns Hopkins figures flagged in the caveat, treat the ordering as more reliable than the exact percentages. Use this chart to identify the safety signal being measured and why the recommendation prioritizes facility-level improvement, infection control, and outcome-linked accountability.

Caveat These are contested, modeled Leapfrog and Johns Hopkins figures, not a settled number, and should be read alongside competing patient-safety estimates.

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% B 35% C 88% D or F 92%
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
Safety gradeGreater avoidable-death risk vs an A hospital (percent)
B35
C88
D or F92

Leapfrog and Johns Hopkins Armstrong Institute, Lives Lost Lives Saved · 2019 · source

Share of hospitals penalized each year: infections vs readmissions

Percent of eligible hospitals penalized under each Medicare program. Both hold nearly flat because each uses a relative cutoff, the top quartile for infections and the peer-group median for readmissions, not an absolute threshold.

Read it this way Both lines stay in a narrow band across the years shown, HRRP between 75 and 83 percent and HACRP mostly at 24 to 25 percent, supporting the note that a relative-cutoff design produces an almost fixed penalized share regardless of whether hospitals actually get safer. The FY2023 drop to 0 percent for HACRP is a program pause, not evidence hospitals improved that year. Use this chart to identify the safety signal being measured and why the recommendation prioritizes facility-level improvement, infection control, and outcome-linked accountability.

Caveat FY2019 is omitted because CMS did not publish a HACRP penalized share that year. The FY2023 HACRP value is 0 percent because CMS paused HACRP penalties over pandemic data distortion. HACRP penalizes about a quarter of hospitals by quartile design.

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% FY2018FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024 Readmissions (HRRP)Infections (HACRP) PROGRAM YEAR HOSPITALS PENALIZED (PERCENT)
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
Program yearHACRP penalized (percent)HRRP penalized (percent)
FY20182579
FY2019not published82
FY202024.783
FY20212583
FY202224.582
FY20230 (paused)75
FY20242578

CMS Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program and Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program · FY2024 · source

Who falls behind

The safety gap is not uniform. It varies by hospital ownership and by state.

57.7%
Share of hospitals earning an A in Utah, the top state, Spring 2024
Utah and Virginia (56.3 percent) are the only states where most hospitals earned an A.
4
States where no hospital earned an A grade, Fall 2024
Iowa, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Vermont.

Share earning an A by hospital ownership, Spring 2024

Percent of hospitals earning an A by ownership type. Government-owned hospitals trail nonprofits by nearly two to one.

Read it this way Nonprofit hospitals earn an A at nearly twice the rate of government-owned hospitals, 33 percent versus 17 percent, with for-profit in between at 28 percent. This is one national cycle's ownership breakdown. It does not show whether the gap holds in every state or persists across grading cycles. Use this chart to identify the safety signal being measured and why the recommendation prioritizes facility-level improvement, infection control, and outcome-linked accountability.

0% 13% 25% 38% 50% Nonprofit 33% For-profit 28% Government-owned 17%
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
Ownership typeEarning an A (percent)
Nonprofit33
For-profit28
Government-owned17

Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade, by ownership · Spring 2024 · source

States by share of A hospitals, known extremes

Each dot is one state. The spread runs from majority-A states down to four states where no hospital earned an A.

Read it this way The gap between Utah's 57.7 percent and the four states sitting at zero A hospitals shows real state-level variation, but only 14 of 50 states appear here, the Spring 2024 top 10 plus the four Fall 2024 states with no A-graded hospital. Do not read this as a full 50-state ranking: the middle of the distribution is simply missing from this dataset. Use this chart to identify the safety signal being measured and why the recommendation prioritizes facility-level improvement, infection control, and outcome-linked accountability.

Caveat Only 14 of 50 states are in the source file, the Spring 2024 top-10 states and the four Fall 2024 states with no A-graded hospital. A complete 50-state ranking is not published in this dataset.

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% Utah 57.7% Virginia 56.3% New Jersey 44.8% Colorado 44.4% Rhode Island 44.4% Alaska 42.9% Pennsylvania 42.7% North Carolina 42.2% South Carolina 42.0% Maine 41.2% Iowa 0.0% North Dakota 0.0% South Dakota 0.0% Vermont 0.0%
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
StateHospitals earning an A (percent)
Utah57.7
Virginia56.3
New Jersey44.8
Colorado44.4
Rhode Island44.4
Alaska42.9
Pennsylvania42.7
North Carolina42.2
South Carolina42
Maine41.2
Iowa0
North Dakota0
South Dakota0
Vermont0

Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade, state rankings · Spring 2024 · source

Why this matters

Medicare's own penalty programs are built on relative cutoffs, the top quartile for infections and the peer-group median for readmissions, not absolute improvement thresholds, so the share of hospitals penalized stays fixed near 78 to 83 percent for readmissions and about 25 percent for infections regardless of whether hospitals actually get safer. Against that flat backdrop, five of seven tracked infection types have fallen well below their 2015 baseline, C. difficile down 62.5 percent and CLABSI down 34 percent, showing the underlying tools do work. Two measures are the exception: surgical-site infection after abdominal hysterectomy reversed after 2019 and is now 11.2 percent above baseline and still climbing, and ventilator-associated events remain 10.5 percent above baseline after a COVID-era spike.

Recommended actions

  • Target infection-prevention resources specifically at surgical-site infection after abdominal hysterectomy and at ventilator-associated events, the two measures still above baseline, rather than treating all hospital-acquired infections as one improving trend.
  • Watch the A-grade share, which held a flat 29 to 34 percent band for eight years. The Spring 2026 jump to 39 percent coincides with a new exclusion of 450 non-participating hospitals, so confirm it repeats in a like-for-like cycle before calling it real improvement.
  • Flag government-owned hospitals for targeted safety-improvement support given the near two-to-one gap against nonprofits (17 percent versus 33 percent earning an A).
  • Track the four zero-A states for state-level intervention and watch whether the relative-cutoff penalty designs are driving real improvement or simply reallocating a fixed penalty share each year.
  • Treat the 160,000-avoidable-deaths and grade-based mortality-risk figures as directional only, since they are contested modeled estimates disputed in the patient-safety literature.

The recommendation

Therefore, run safety improvement as a facility-level performance turnaround program. The recommended approach is to prioritize low-performing hospitals and worsening infection types, align penalties with harm reduction, and require transparent measurement that connects safety grades to patient outcomes.

Demographic slice none. AHRQ/CMS HAC/Leapfrog data is hospital-level, not patient-demographic-level.

Sources