off label.
Filters
State
charts re-slice where a pre-computed view exists

Rural deserts

Why are maternity deserts forming, and what is happening to rural hospitals and obstetric units?

More than a third of US counties, 1,104 in all, are maternity care deserts with no birthing hospital and no obstetric clinician. 107 obstetric units closed in just 2021 and 2022, and North Dakota tops the list with 73.6% of its counties classified as deserts.

Question

The problem

Rural access is deteriorating because the national hospital landscape relies on low-volume essential services that the standard hospital business model does not reliably support. Maternity care, emergency access, and inpatient capacity can disappear before a community registers as a full closure, leaving residents with longer travel, higher clinical risk, and fewer local options.

The recommendation

Position rural hospitals and obstetric units as essential infrastructure, then fund them with an explicit stability strategy rather than hoping volume will cover fixed costs. The recommended response is a tiered rural-access program that identifies early service-line losses, targets financially vulnerable hospitals, and links payment support to preserving emergency, obstetric, and transfer capacity.

The gap

The scale of maternity care deserts, who is exposed, and where they concentrate, set against the separate rural-hospital-closure map.

35.1%
of US counties are maternity care deserts
1,104 counties. More than 2.3 million women of reproductive age live in one, and about 150,000 babies were born in a desert in 2022.

Women living in counties without full maternity access

March of Dimes 2024. About 150,000 babies were born in a desert in 2022.

Read it this way The 5.5 million figure for no-or-limited-access counties is more than double the 2.3 million figure for full deserts alone, showing limited-access counties, not just full deserts, account for most of the affected population. The 150,000 births in a desert in 2022 is a separate flow measure and isn't part of these two population bars. Use this chart to distinguish current access loss from early warning indicators, then connect the evidence to the recommendation to intervene before a service-line loss becomes a full rural access desert.

0 2,500,000 5,000,000 7,500,000 10,000,000 Women in no or limited access counties 5,500,000 Women of reproductive age in full deserts 2,300,000
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
GroupWomen
Women in no or limited access counties5500000
Women of reproductive age in full deserts2300000
Babies born in deserts (2022)150000

March of Dimes, Nowhere to Go: Maternity Care Deserts Across the US, 2024 · 2024 · source

Rural share of maternity care deserts

Based on the 2022 report edition. The urban share is derived as the complement of the published 61.5% rural share.

Read it this way Nearly two in three maternity care deserts sit in rural counties, confirming this is predominantly a rural-access problem, though the 38.5% urban share means it isn't exclusively one. This slice is from the 2022 report edition, one cycle earlier than the 35.1% desert-share headline used elsewhere on this dashboard. Use this chart to distinguish current access loss from early warning indicators, then connect the evidence to the recommendation to intervene before a service-line loss becomes a full rural access desert.

61.5% rural Rural counties 61.5% · 62% Urban counties 38.5% · 39%
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
County typeShare of deserts (%)
Rural counties61.5
Urban counties (derived complement)38.5

March of Dimes, Nowhere to Go: Maternity Care Deserts Across the US, 2022 · 2022 · source

States with the highest maternity-care-desert share (2024)

Share of each state's counties classified as maternity care deserts. Reference line is the national 35.1%.

Read it this way All six states shown sit well above the 35.1% national reference line, with North Dakota at 73.6%, more than double the national rate. This ranks only the worst states, so it can't show how many states fall below the national average. Use this chart to distinguish current access loss from early warning indicators, then connect the evidence to the recommendation to intervene before a service-line loss becomes a full rural access desert.

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% North Dakota 73.6% South Dakota 57.6% Oklahoma 51.9% Missouri 51.6% Nebraska 51.3% Arkansas 50.7% National average
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
StateDesert share of counties (%)
North Dakota73.6
South Dakota57.6
Oklahoma51.9
Missouri51.6
Nebraska51.3
Arkansas50.7

March of Dimes, Nowhere to Go: Maternity Care Deserts Across the US, 2024 · 2024 · source

Share of a state's rural hospitals vulnerable to closure (2026)

Chartis 2026 financial-risk model. This is a different measure from desert share and a different source.

Read it this way Even the best case shown, Kansas at 44%, means more than 4 in 10 of its rural hospitals are at closure risk, rising to 61% in Tennessee. This is a distinct 2026 financial-risk measure from the desert-share chart beside it, so a state can rank high here without necessarily ranking high on maternity-desert share. Use this chart to distinguish current access loss from early warning indicators, then connect the evidence to the recommendation to intervene before a service-line loss becomes a full rural access desert.

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Tennessee 61% Arkansas 55% Florida 52% Kansas 44%
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
StateRural hospitals vulnerable to closure (%)
Tennessee61
Arkansas55
Florida52
Kansas44

Chartis Center for Rural Health, 2026 Rural Health State of the State · 2026 · source

Why it's happening

The mechanism behind the deserts: rural hospital closures, accelerating obstetric-unit loss, thin finances, and the Medicaid-expansion lever.

107
hospital obstetric units closed in 2021 and 2022
About 1 in every 25 units. More than 100 counties lost maternity access since the 2022 report.

Rural hospital closures by year, 2010 to 2026

Sheps Center. Complete means no health services remain, converted means some services remain. The 2021 dip reflects COVID relief funding. 2025 and 2026 are provisional.

Read it this way The tallest bars cluster in 2015 and 2019-2020, and the visible dip at 2021 lines up with COVID relief funding rather than a real recovery, since totals climbed again right after. Because 2025 and 2026 are provisional, don't read the recent right-hand end of the chart as a confirmed slowdown yet. Use this chart to distinguish current access loss from early warning indicators, then connect the evidence to the recommendation to intervene before a service-line loss becomes a full rural access desert.

0 5 10 15 20 20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026 Complete (no services left) Converted (some services remain)
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
YearCompleteConvertedTotal closures
2010213
2011235
2012459
20135813
20148614
201511617
20165510
2017628
20189413
201910717
20208816
2021022
2022347
2023527
2024415
2025336
2026112

UNC Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Rural Hospital Closures · 2026 · source

Rural obstetric units eliminated, cumulative (Chartis report editions)

Cumulative rural obstetric units eliminated since 2011, by report edition. The 2026 total (331) is about 27% of all rural OB units.

Read it this way The cumulative count rises across all three report editions, and the 331 total is about 27% of all rural OB units, so rural obstetric access has been shrinking continuously rather than stabilizing. Because each point is a cumulative total from a different report edition with a different window, the chart shows growing scale, not a year-by-year closure rate. Use this chart to distinguish current access loss from early warning indicators, then connect the evidence to the recommendation to intervene before a service-line loss becomes a full rural access desert.

0 125 250 375 500 2024 report2025 report2026 report OB units eliminated
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
Chartis reportCumulative OB units eliminatedWindow
20242672011 to 2021
20252932011 to 2023
20263312011 to 2024

Chartis Center for Rural Health, Rural Health State of the State (2024 to 2026 editions) · 2026 · source

Share of rural hospitals operating in the red, 2024 to 2026

Chartis report editions. Lower is better.

Read it this way The share of rural hospitals in the red fell each year, from 50% to 41.2%, but the caveat shows that improvement rides on a still-thin national median margin, 1.0% in 2025 and 2.0% in 2026. So hospitals in the red are shrinking in number while the survivors remain financially fragile, not clearly turning a strong profit. Use this chart to distinguish current access loss from early warning indicators, then connect the evidence to the recommendation to intervene before a service-line loss becomes a full rural access desert.

Caveat The companion national median operating margin is not published for the 2024 report. Chartis reports it at 1.0% (2025) and 2.0% (2026), so the red-share improvement tracks a thin but recovering margin.

0.0% 12.5% 25.0% 37.5% 50.0% 202420252026 Operating in the red
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
Chartis reportOperating in the red (%)National median operating margin (%)
202450not published
2025461
202641.22

Chartis Center for Rural Health, Rural Health State of the State (2024 to 2026 editions) · 2026 · source

Rural hospitals in the red: Medicaid expansion vs non-expansion states (2026)

Chartis 2026. Median operating margin was +2.9% in expansion states versus -0.7% in non-expansion states.

Read it this way Non-expansion states have a rural-hospital red-margin rate 17 points higher than expansion states, and the underlying margins run positive (+2.9%) in expansion states versus negative (-0.7%) in non-expansion states. This is an association tied to one policy variable, so it doesn't rule out other state-level differences accounting for part of the gap. Use this chart to distinguish current access loss from early warning indicators, then connect the evidence to the recommendation to intervene before a service-line loss becomes a full rural access desert.

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% Medicaid expansion states 34.9% Non-expansion states 52.2%
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
GroupOperating in the red (%)Median operating margin (%)
Medicaid expansion states34.92.9
Non-expansion states52.2-0.7

Chartis Center for Rural Health, 2026 Rural Health State of the State · 2026 · source

Who bears it

The human cost, in drive time and in health risk, for a family stuck in a desert.

Drive time to the nearest birthing hospital (minutes)

Estimated drive time with no traffic. Reference line is the US average of 16 minutes.

Read it this way Maternity-desert residents can face drive times of up to 38 minutes, more than double the 16-minute US average, and even the rural average of 26 minutes runs well above the national figure. The desert figure is stated as a maximum ('up to'), so it isn't a strict apples-to-apples average like the other two bars. Use this chart to distinguish current access loss from early warning indicators, then connect the evidence to the recommendation to intervene before a service-line loss becomes a full rural access desert.

0 13 25 38 50 Maternity desert residents (up to) 38 Rural average 26 US average 16 US average
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
GroupDrive time (minutes)
Maternity desert residents (up to)38
Rural average26
US average16

March of Dimes 2024, via Healthcare Brew · 2024 · source

Increased risk of preterm birth associated with limited maternity access

Increased risk associated with living in a desert or low-access county. This is an association, not a proven cause. Pre-pregnancy hypertension is about 1.3 times higher in deserts.

Read it this way Both full deserts (13%) and low-access counties (11%) show a similarly elevated preterm-birth risk, so the effect isn't confined to the most extreme access gap. As the caveat states, this is an association: the chart can't establish that limited maternity access itself causes the higher preterm-birth rate. Use this chart to distinguish current access loss from early warning indicators, then connect the evidence to the recommendation to intervene before a service-line loss becomes a full rural access desert.

Caveat March of Dimes reports these as associations, not causal effects.

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% Full maternity deserts 13% Low-access counties 11%
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
County typeIncreased preterm-birth risk (%)
Full maternity deserts13
Low-access counties11

March of Dimes, Nowhere to Go: Maternity Care Deserts Across the US, 2024 · 2024 · source

Geography

The same question, state by state and then county by county. Pick a state in the filter above to drill into its counties.

Hospital closure-risk score

County · direct count

Each tile is a state. Pick a state in the Scope control above to drill into its counties.

AK ME WA ID MT ND MN WI MI NY VT NH OR NV WY SD IA IL IN OH PA NJ MA CA UT CO NE MO KY WV VA MD CT RI AZ NM KS AR TN NC SC DC DE OK LA MS AL GA TX FL HI better than benchmark worse

CMS Hospital Cost Report / HealthPulse county summaries · 2024 · source

Transportation barriers

County · modeled prevalence (95% CI)

Each tile is a state. Pick a state in the Scope control above to drill into its counties.

AK 9.2% ME 8.1% WA ID 7.6% MT 7.8% ND 6.6% MN 7.3% WI 7.0% MI 8.5% NY 8.8% VT NH 5.8% OR NV 10.2% WY SD IA 7.0% IL 8.2% IN 7.9% OH 7.9% PA NJ 7.6% MA 7.7% CA 9.4% UT 6.8% CO NE 6.8% MO 8.6% KY WV 9.2% VA 7.6% MD 8.0% CT 8.5% RI 8.1% AZ 8.9% NM 11.4% KS 7.3% AR 10.0% TN NC 8.6% SC 8.8% DC 7.9% DE 8.0% OK 9.8% LA 11.6% MS 12.2% AL 10.0% GA 9.7% TX FL HI 7.8% better than benchmark worse

CDC PLACES (model-based small-area estimates) · 2024 · source

Why this matters

The number of rural obstetric units eliminated has climbed every report cycle, from 267 in 2024 to 331 in 2026, now about 27% of all rural OB units, and 107 units closed in just 2021 and 2022 alone, roughly 1 in every 25. The finances explain why: even as the share of rural hospitals operating in the red improved from 50% to 41.2% between 2024 and 2026, the national median operating margin remains thin at just 2.0%, and Medicaid expansion states run a 17-point-lower red-margin rate than non-expansion states (34.9% vs 52.2%). Leadership should care because this is an accelerating, financially driven closure trend, not a stable baseline of underserved geography.

Recommended actions

  • Target reimbursement floors or supplemental payments for low-volume rural obstetric units, since low birth volume and low reimbursement are the cited closure drivers.
  • Prioritize the six highest-desert-share states (North Dakota, South Dakota, Oklahoma, Missouri, Nebraska, Arkansas) for any pilot intervention.
  • Monitor the Chartis closure-risk states (Tennessee, Arkansas, Florida, Kansas) as an early-warning list, since even the best of them, Kansas, still has 44% of rural hospitals at risk.
  • Watch the Medicaid-expansion margin gap (+2.9% vs -0.7%) as evidence for the value of expansion in stabilizing rural obstetric finances, without treating it as proof of a single causal lever.
  • Track cumulative rural OB units eliminated, currently 331 or about 27% of all rural OB units, each Chartis report cycle as the top-line KPI for whether the trend is slowing.

The recommendation

Therefore, position rural hospitals and obstetric units as essential infrastructure, then fund them with an explicit stability strategy rather than hoping volume will cover fixed costs. The recommended response is a tiered rural-access program that identifies early service-line losses, targets financially vulnerable hospitals, and links payment support to preserving emergency, obstetric, and transfer capacity.

Demographic slice geography (county) only, March of Dimes and Sheps Center data has no native race or income field.

Sources