Hospital ecosystem & closure risk
Which communities are one closure away from a care desert?
1,545 US hospitals are the only hospital in their county, and 1,319 are federally designated sole community providers. When one of those closes, the next-nearest hospital can be tens of miles away. This view ranks the single-hospital communities by a modeled closure-risk score and maps where the exposure concentrates. The desert flags are real, CMS-derived facts. The closure risk is modeled (survival_v3) and should be read as a prioritization signal, not a prophecy.
The problem
Access does not fail evenly. It fails first in the counties served by one hospital, where a single closure converts a community into a care desert. These facilities are disproportionately rural, negative-margin, and Medicaid-heavy: exactly the ones federal payment starves and no early-warning system watches.
The recommendation
Stand up a closure early-warning function targeted at single-hospital communities. Rank sole-provider hospitals by modeled closure risk, monitor the highest-risk facilities in your state, and pre-position rural-emergency conversion and support before a closure forces patients into hour-long drives.
Where the single-hospital communities are
Count of only-hospital-in-county facilities per state. This is a real CMS-derived flag, not a model output.
Read it this way Bluer states have more counties dependent on a single hospital. Rural, low-density states carry the most exposure. Pick a state to spotlight it and re-slice the at-risk list below to that state. Use the single-hospital map to see where exposure concentrates, the closure-risk map and mix to see where failure is most likely, and the at-risk list to name the specific facilities. Then tie those to the recommended monitoring and support actions.
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
| State | Only-hospital counties |
|---|---|
| TX | 123 |
| GA | 84 |
| IA | 69 |
| KS | 68 |
| KY | 65 |
| TN | 55 |
| MS | 54 |
| NC | 53 |
| NE | 50 |
| OK | 49 |
| VA | 48 |
| IN | 47 |
| MO | 47 |
| MN | 46 |
| MI | 45 |
| IL | 44 |
| OH | 41 |
| AL | 38 |
| AR | 37 |
| MT | 37 |
| SD | 34 |
| WV | 32 |
| CO | 30 |
| WI | 28 |
| ID | 26 |
| NY | 24 |
| ND | 23 |
| SC | 22 |
| PA | 21 |
| LA | 19 |
| OR | 19 |
| NM | 17 |
| FL | 15 |
| WA | 15 |
| WY | 15 |
| CA | 14 |
| UT | 13 |
| AK | 12 |
| NV | 12 |
| PR | 11 |
| MD | 10 |
| VT | 9 |
| ME | 5 |
| NJ | 5 |
| MA | 3 |
| NH | 3 |
| AZ | 2 |
| RI | 2 |
| VI | 2 |
| AS | 1 |
| MP | 1 |
CMS Medicare patient-flow (HSA) + Care Compare + ACS/AHRF ecosystem pipelines · 2026-06-23 · source
Modeled closure-risk mix
Hospitals by modeled closure-risk band (high ≥60, medium 30–60, low <30).
Read it this way How the modeled risk spreads across all hospitals: most sit low, a smaller band is elevated. The elevated band is the watchlist, not a closure forecast. Use the single-hospital map to see where exposure concentrates, the closure-risk map and mix to see where failure is most likely, and the at-risk list to name the specific facilities. Then tie those to the recommended monitoring and support actions.
Caveat Closure risk is modeled (survival_v3) from financial, quality, and ecosystem features, calibrated on observed distress events. Treat it as prioritization, not prophecy.
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
| Risk band | Hospitals |
|---|---|
| high | 22 |
| medium | 187 |
| low | 5217 |
Off Label closure model (survival_v3) · 2026-06-23 · source
Modeled closure risk by state
Mean modeled closure-risk score across each state's hospitals.
Read it this way Average modeled closure risk per state (0–100). Read it alongside the single-hospital map: a state that scores high on both is where a closure is both likely and leaves no fallback. Use the single-hospital map to see where exposure concentrates, the closure-risk map and mix to see where failure is most likely, and the at-risk list to name the specific facilities. Then tie those to the recommended monitoring and support actions.
Caveat Modeled (survival_v3), not observed. State averages smooth over wide facility-level variation.
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
| State | Mean closure risk |
|---|---|
| AS | 21.5 |
| WV | 16.3 |
| LA | 14.2 |
| MP | 13.9 |
| IN | 12.7 |
| OH | 12.5 |
| PR | 10.9 |
| MA | 9.3 |
| MI | 9.3 |
| PA | 9.1 |
| TN | 8.9 |
| RI | 8.4 |
| WI | 8.1 |
| SC | 7.5 |
| AR | 7.2 |
| HI | 7.1 |
| VA | 6.9 |
| KY | 6.5 |
| IA | 6.3 |
| MS | 6.1 |
| NM | 6.1 |
| CT | 6 |
| KS | 6 |
| NC | 6 |
| ME | 5.9 |
| NV | 5.9 |
| AL | 5.8 |
| AZ | 5.8 |
| NY | 5.8 |
| MO | 5.7 |
| VT | 5.7 |
| NE | 5.5 |
| OK | 5.5 |
| MD | 5.3 |
| MN | 5.3 |
| WA | 5.2 |
| DE | 5.1 |
| IL | 5.1 |
| SD | 5 |
| TX | 5 |
| MT | 4.8 |
| OR | 4.7 |
| FL | 4.4 |
| ID | 4.3 |
| GA | 4.2 |
| UT | 4.1 |
| DC | 4 |
| VI | 4 |
| CA | 3.8 |
| CO | 3.8 |
| ND | 3.5 |
| NH | 3.5 |
| WY | 3.5 |
| NJ | 3.1 |
| AK | 3 |
| GU | 1.4 |
Off Label closure model (survival_v3) · 2026-06-23 · source
One closure from a care desert: highest-risk single-hospital communities
Top single-hospital communities by modeled closure risk. Filter by state to see yours.
Read it this way The only-hospital-in-county facilities with the highest modeled closure risk: the communities that would lose all local inpatient care first. Pick a state to rebuild this list for your own delegation. Use the single-hospital map to see where exposure concentrates, the closure-risk map and mix to see where failure is most likely, and the at-risk list to name the specific facilities. Then tie those to the recommended monitoring and support actions.
Caveat Ranked by modeled closure risk (survival_v3). Facility names and 'only hospital' status are CMS-derived facts. Scoped to general-acute hospitals (Acute Care, Critical Access, Rural Emergency), because a closed general hospital is what turns a county into a care desert. Specialty and federal facilities are excluded.
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
| Hospital | Type | State | County | Closure risk | Nearest hospital (mi) | Sole community |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASSUMPTION COMMUNITY HOSPITAL | Rural Emergency Hospital | LA | ASSUMPTION | 80.9 | 10.5 | yes |
| CROSBYTON CLINIC HOSPITAL | Rural Emergency Hospital | TX | CROSBY | 78.6 | 37.3 | yes |
| WEBSTER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | CAH | WV | WEBSTER | 76.5 | 23.8 | yes |
| SAINT THOMAS HICKMAN HOSPITAL | CAH | TN | HICKMAN | 51.8 | 23.9 | yes |
| REGIONAL WEST MEDICAL CENTER | Acute Care | NE | SCOTT BLUFF | 51.7 | 29.3 | yes |
| ANSON GENERAL HOSPITAL | Rural Emergency Hospital | TX | JONES | 50.5 | 18.5 | yes |
| ASCENSION ST VINCENT SALEM | CAH | IN | WASHINGTON | 49.4 | 20.5 | yes |
| UNION HOSPITAL CLINTON | CAH | IN | VERMILLION | 49 | 12.9 | yes |
| LAFOLLETTE MEDICAL CENTER | Acute Care | TN | CAMPBELL | 47.9 | 23.8 | yes |
| STONES RIVER HOSPITAL | Acute Care | TN | CANNON | 47.1 | 15.7 | no |
| JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL | Rural Emergency Hospital | MS | JEFFERSON | 46.1 | 18.5 | yes |
| CAMERON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | Acute Care | MO | CLINTON | 46.1 | 28.3 | no |
| FALLS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND CLINIC | Rural Emergency Hospital | TX | FALLS | 45.2 | 22.8 | yes |
| GREENE COUNTY HOSPITAL | Acute Care | AL | GREENE | 40.9 | 25.3 | no |
| POINTE COUPEE GENERAL HOSPITAL | CAH | LA | POINTE COUPEE | 39.7 | 12.9 | yes |
| GENESIS MEDICAL CENTER, ALEDO | CAH | IL | MERCER | 37.4 | 19.9 | yes |
| ALLIANCE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC | Acute Care | MS | MARSHALL | 36 | 22 | yes |
| MAGRUDER HOSPITAL | CAH | OH | OTTAWA | 34.9 | 25.8 | yes |
| VALLEY HEALTH WAR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | CAH | WV | MORGAN | 33.4 | 14.7 | yes |
| TRISTAR ASHLAND CITY MEDICAL CENTER | Rural Emergency Hospital | TN | CHEATHAM | 33.2 | 17.5 | yes |
| ASCENSION BORGESS LEE HOSPITAL | CAH | MI | CASS | 31.8 | 12.6 | yes |
| MEDINA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | CAH | NY | ORLEANS | 31.2 | 17 | yes |
| GRAFTON CITY HOSPITAL, INC | CAH | WV | TAYLOR | 30.9 | 9.1 | yes |
| WILLIAMSON MEMORIAL INC | Acute Care | WV | MINGO | 29.8 | 3.8 | yes |
| KALKASKA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER | CAH | MI | KALKASKA | 29 | 21.8 | yes |
| ST ELIZABETH GRANT | CAH | KY | GRANT | 28.7 | 21 | yes |
| PAUL OLIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | CAH | MI | BENZIE | 28.6 | 26.7 | yes |
| SAINT MARY'S STANDISH COMMUNITY HOSPITAL | CAH | MI | ARENAC | 28.4 | 26.5 | yes |
| ST BERNARDS FIVE RIVERS MEDICAL CENTER | Rural Emergency Hospital | AR | RANDOLPH | 28 | 20.4 | yes |
| ASCENSION ST VINCENT CLAY | CAH | IN | CLAY | 27.9 | 14.4 | yes |
| DAVIS MEDICAL CENTER | Acute Care | WV | RANDOLPH | 27.7 | 20.8 | yes |
| ST CHARLES MEDICAL CENTER PRINEVILLE | CAH | OR | CROOK | 26.5 | 27.3 | yes |
| WARM SPRINGS MEDICAL CENTER | CAH | GA | MERIWETHER | 26.4 | 23 | yes |
| DICKENSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL | CAH | VA | DICKENSON | 26.4 | 22.1 | yes |
| BROADDUS HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC | CAH | WV | BARBOUR | 26.3 | 13.6 | yes |
| HOLMES COUNTY HOSPITAL AND CLINICS | CAH | MS | HOLMES | 24.8 | 27.4 | yes |
| GOODALL WITCHER HOSPITAL | CAH | TX | BOSQUE | 24.1 | 26.5 | yes |
| SANFORD WHEATON MEDICAL CENTER | CAH | MN | TRAVERSE | 23.6 | 18.2 | yes |
| MINNESOTA VALLEY HEALTH CENTER INC | CAH | MN | LE SUEUR | 23.6 | 8.4 | yes |
| COBLESKILL REGIONAL HOSPITAL | CAH | NY | SCHOHARIE | 23.6 | 18.6 | yes |
CMS Medicare patient-flow (HSA) + Care Compare + ACS/AHRF ecosystem pipelines · 2026-06-23 · source
Share of residents more than 60 minutes from a hospital, by state
Percent of each state's population beyond a 60-minute drive of the nearest open acute hospital.
Read it this way A rural-West story: Alaska (12.6%), New Mexico, Wyoming, the Dakotas, and Montana lead. Dense states sit near zero. Pick a state to spotlight it, and read it against the single-hospital-county map. A state dark on both is where distance and dependence compound. Use the single-hospital map to see where exposure concentrates, the closure-risk map and mix to see where failure is most likely, and the at-risk list to name the specific facilities. Then tie those to the recommended monitoring and support actions.
Caveat Drive time is a routed road-network isochrone (Valhalla over OpenStreetMap), so catchments follow real roads and speeds. See the methodology note.
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
| State | % beyond 60 min | People beyond 60 min | Hospitals |
|---|---|---|---|
| AK | 18.832 | 138113 | 21 |
| WY | 15.886 | 91636 | 27 |
| MT | 6.301 | 68318 | 61 |
| NM | 4.888 | 103512 | 40 |
| SD | 4.14 | 36711 | 57 |
| HI | 2.576 | 37482 | 20 |
| AZ | 2.334 | 166950 | 81 |
| ID | 2.167 | 39856 | 43 |
| ME | 2.01 | 27380 | 31 |
| ND | 1.747 | 13608 | 44 |
| CO | 1.407 | 81265 | 83 |
| NV | 1.335 | 41446 | 35 |
| OR | 1.059 | 44883 | 57 |
| UT | 1.005 | 32877 | 45 |
| WA | 0.862 | 66429 | 84 |
| WV | 0.417 | 7483 | 46 |
| MN | 0.388 | 22130 | 123 |
| MO | 0.357 | 21992 | 97 |
| NH | 0.307 | 4234 | 25 |
| PR | 0.307 | 10100 | 46 |
| LA | 0.296 | 13773 | 110 |
| CA | 0.283 | 111814 | 315 |
| AR | 0.23 | 6915 | 76 |
| NE | 0.185 | 3636 | 87 |
| TX | 0.154 | 44837 | 380 |
| VT | 0.146 | 939 | 14 |
| WI | 0.134 | 7889 | 123 |
| RI | 0.128 | 1410 | 10 |
| NC | 0.125 | 13076 | 99 |
| MI | 0.121 | 12167 | 125 |
| FL | 0.12 | 25779 | 180 |
| OK | 0.115 | 4571 | 118 |
| AL | 0.094 | 4700 | 88 |
| NY | 0.091 | 18418 | 150 |
| MA | 0.082 | 5745 | 59 |
| TN | 0.078 | 5365 | 95 |
| VA | 0.058 | 4964 | 78 |
| KY | 0.041 | 1850 | 88 |
| GA | 0.027 | 2872 | 125 |
| SC | 0.025 | 1297 | 54 |
| MS | 0.024 | 716 | 94 |
| PA | 0.024 | 3171 | 149 |
| MD | 0.019 | 1178 | 43 |
| OH | 0.009 | 1069 | 151 |
| IL | 0.008 | 985 | 169 |
| CT | 0 | 0 | 25 |
| DC | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| DE | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| IA | 0 | 0 | 112 |
| IN | 0 | 0 | 115 |
| KS | 0 | 0 | 129 |
| NJ | 0 | 2 | 61 |
Valhalla 3.8.1 auto-costing isochrones over OpenStreetMap (Geofabrik US regional extracts, 2026-07-06 vintage); CMS hospital_master + provider_of_services (staffed beds); U.S. Census Bureau 2020 block-group population-weighted centroids · 2026-07-07 · source
If this hospital closed, who loses adequate access
People who would fall below the access-adequacy threshold if the named hospital closed (top 10).
Read it this way An E2SFCA model of who would fall below the access-adequacy threshold if a given hospital closed. Large metro hospitals hovering near the adequacy line top the list, not only rural ones (a reminder that access is a supply-vs-population ratio, not distance alone). Use the single-hospital map to see where exposure concentrates, the closure-risk map and mix to see where failure is most likely, and the at-risk list to name the specific facilities. Then tie those to the recommended monitoring and support actions.
Caveat E2SFCA closure-impact estimate built on the valhalla_isochrone drive-time model. It ranks people-at-risk, not certainty of loss.
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
| Hospital | State | People at risk | Staffed beds |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHARP MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | CA | 1825774 | 881 |
| SCRIPPS MERCY HOSPITAL | CA | 1498807 | 700 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS MEDICAL CENTER | CA | 1438414 | 631 |
| KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL - SACRAMENTO | CA | 1409465 | 628 |
| UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HOSPITAL AND CLINICS | UT | 1348807 | 1013 |
| SANTA CLARA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER | CA | 1341355 | 1337 |
| SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER | WA | 1223335 | 697 |
| ST DAVID'S MEDICAL CENTER | TX | 1188411 | 625 |
| KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL - SAN DIEGO | CA | 1142379 | 659 |
| METHODIST HOSPITAL | TX | 1126199 | 2465 |
| MEMORIAL HERMANN HOSPITAL SYSTEM | TX | 1103968 | 1515 |
| LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL | PA | 1096467 | 996 |
| SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER, SACRAMENTO | CA | 1090810 | 523 |
| SPECTRUM HEALTH | MI | 1084951 | 1135 |
| UC SAN DIEGO HEALTH HILLCREST - HILLCREST MED CTR | CA | 1064466 | 600 |
Valhalla 3.8.1 auto-costing isochrones over OpenStreetMap (Geofabrik US regional extracts, 2026-07-06 vintage); CMS hospital_master + provider_of_services (staffed beds); U.S. Census Bureau 2020 block-group population-weighted centroids · 2026-07-07 · source
Why this matters
Federal payment rewards volume and scale, which structurally disadvantages the low-volume hospitals that are the only option for their catchment. Closures are reported after the fact, so support arrives too late. The data to predict them (financial distress, quality, isolation, market structure) already exists and is not being used as a watchlist.
Recommended actions
- Build a state-level watchlist from the at-risk list: the only-hospital-in-county facilities with the highest modeled closure risk are the ones to monitor first.
- Pre-position Rural Emergency Hospital conversion and sole-community-provider payment support for the highest-risk facilities before they fail, not after.
- Pair the closure-risk map with the single-hospital map: prioritize states that score high on both, where a closure is both likely and leaves no fallback.
- Treat the modeled score as a trigger for a human financial review, not as an automatic verdict: confirm distress before acting.
The recommendation
Therefore, run a closure early-warning function on the single-hospital communities. Rank sole-provider hospitals by modeled closure risk, watch the highest-risk facilities in your state, and move support upstream of the closure so no community loses all local care with no warning.
Demographic slice Facility level, national. 'Only hospital in county' and 'sole community provider' are CMS-derived flags. Flow-based catchment marks hospitals whose Medicare patients use essentially no other facility. Closure risk is modeled from financial, quality, and ecosystem features.
Sources