off label.
Filters
State
charts re-slice where a pre-computed view exists

Hospital ecosystem & closure risk

Which communities are one closure away from a care desert?

1,545 US hospitals are the only hospital in their county, and 1,319 are federally designated sole community providers. When one of those closes, the next-nearest hospital can be tens of miles away. This view ranks the single-hospital communities by a modeled closure-risk score and maps where the exposure concentrates. The desert flags are real, CMS-derived facts. The closure risk is modeled (survival_v3) and should be read as a prioritization signal, not a prophecy.

Question

The problem

Access does not fail evenly. It fails first in the counties served by one hospital, where a single closure converts a community into a care desert. These facilities are disproportionately rural, negative-margin, and Medicaid-heavy: exactly the ones federal payment starves and no early-warning system watches.

The recommendation

Stand up a closure early-warning function targeted at single-hospital communities. Rank sole-provider hospitals by modeled closure risk, monitor the highest-risk facilities in your state, and pre-position rural-emergency conversion and support before a closure forces patients into hour-long drives.

1,545
hospitals that are the only one in their county
of 5,426 US hospitals
1,319
federally designated sole community providers
1,376 are Critical Access Hospitals
12
hospitals whose Medicare patients use no other facility
median hospital competes with 6 others
11.2M
people more than a 30-minute drive from the nearest open acute hospital
3.358% of 335M residents
1.4M
people an hour or more from the nearest open acute hospital
0.405% · overwhelmingly rural

Where the single-hospital communities are

Count of only-hospital-in-county facilities per state. This is a real CMS-derived flag, not a model output.

Read it this way Bluer states have more counties dependent on a single hospital. Rural, low-density states carry the most exposure. Pick a state to spotlight it and re-slice the at-risk list below to that state. Use the single-hospital map to see where exposure concentrates, the closure-risk map and mix to see where failure is most likely, and the at-risk list to name the specific facilities. Then tie those to the recommended monitoring and support actions.

AK 12 ME 5 WA 15 ID 26 MT 37 ND 23 MN 46 WI 28 MI 45 NY 24 VT 9 NH 3 OR 19 NV 12 WY 15 SD 34 IA 69 IL 44 IN 47 OH 41 PA 21 NJ 5 MA 3 CA 14 UT 13 CO 30 NE 50 MO 47 KY 65 WV 32 VA 48 MD 10 CT RI 2 AZ 2 NM 17 KS 68 AR 37 TN 55 NC 53 SC 22 DC DE OK 49 LA 19 MS 54 AL 38 GA 84 TX 123 FL 15 HI 0 123
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
StateOnly-hospital counties
TX123
GA84
IA69
KS68
KY65
TN55
MS54
NC53
NE50
OK49
VA48
IN47
MO47
MN46
MI45
IL44
OH41
AL38
AR37
MT37
SD34
WV32
CO30
WI28
ID26
NY24
ND23
SC22
PA21
LA19
OR19
NM17
FL15
WA15
WY15
CA14
UT13
AK12
NV12
PR11
MD10
VT9
ME5
NJ5
MA3
NH3
AZ2
RI2
VI2
AS1
MP1

CMS Medicare patient-flow (HSA) + Care Compare + ACS/AHRF ecosystem pipelines · 2026-06-23 · source

Modeled closure-risk mix

Hospitals by modeled closure-risk band (high ≥60, medium 30–60, low <30).

Read it this way How the modeled risk spreads across all hospitals: most sit low, a smaller band is elevated. The elevated band is the watchlist, not a closure forecast. Use the single-hospital map to see where exposure concentrates, the closure-risk map and mix to see where failure is most likely, and the at-risk list to name the specific facilities. Then tie those to the recommended monitoring and support actions.

Caveat Closure risk is modeled (survival_v3) from financial, quality, and ecosystem features, calibrated on observed distress events. Treat it as prioritization, not prophecy.

0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 high 22 medium 187 low 5,217
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
Risk bandHospitals
high22
medium187
low5217

Off Label closure model (survival_v3) · 2026-06-23 · source

Modeled closure risk by state

Mean modeled closure-risk score across each state's hospitals.

Read it this way Average modeled closure risk per state (0–100). Read it alongside the single-hospital map: a state that scores high on both is where a closure is both likely and leaves no fallback. Use the single-hospital map to see where exposure concentrates, the closure-risk map and mix to see where failure is most likely, and the at-risk list to name the specific facilities. Then tie those to the recommended monitoring and support actions.

Caveat Modeled (survival_v3), not observed. State averages smooth over wide facility-level variation.

AK 3.0 ME 5.9 WA 5.2 ID 4.3 MT 4.8 ND 3.5 MN 5.3 WI 8.1 MI 9.3 NY 5.8 VT 5.7 NH 3.5 OR 4.7 NV 5.9 WY 3.5 SD 5.0 IA 6.3 IL 5.1 IN 12.7 OH 12.5 PA 9.1 NJ 3.1 MA 9.3 CA 3.8 UT 4.1 CO 3.8 NE 5.5 MO 5.7 KY 6.5 WV 16.3 VA 6.9 MD 5.3 CT 6.0 RI 8.4 AZ 5.8 NM 6.1 KS 6.0 AR 7.2 TN 8.9 NC 6.0 SC 7.5 DC 4.0 DE 5.1 OK 5.5 LA 14.2 MS 6.1 AL 5.8 GA 4.2 TX 5.0 FL 4.4 HI 7.1 0.0 21.5
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
StateMean closure risk
AS21.5
WV16.3
LA14.2
MP13.9
IN12.7
OH12.5
PR10.9
MA9.3
MI9.3
PA9.1
TN8.9
RI8.4
WI8.1
SC7.5
AR7.2
HI7.1
VA6.9
KY6.5
IA6.3
MS6.1
NM6.1
CT6
KS6
NC6
ME5.9
NV5.9
AL5.8
AZ5.8
NY5.8
MO5.7
VT5.7
NE5.5
OK5.5
MD5.3
MN5.3
WA5.2
DE5.1
IL5.1
SD5
TX5
MT4.8
OR4.7
FL4.4
ID4.3
GA4.2
UT4.1
DC4
VI4
CA3.8
CO3.8
ND3.5
NH3.5
WY3.5
NJ3.1
AK3
GU1.4

Off Label closure model (survival_v3) · 2026-06-23 · source

One closure from a care desert: highest-risk single-hospital communities

Top single-hospital communities by modeled closure risk. Filter by state to see yours.

Read it this way The only-hospital-in-county facilities with the highest modeled closure risk: the communities that would lose all local inpatient care first. Pick a state to rebuild this list for your own delegation. Use the single-hospital map to see where exposure concentrates, the closure-risk map and mix to see where failure is most likely, and the at-risk list to name the specific facilities. Then tie those to the recommended monitoring and support actions.

Caveat Ranked by modeled closure risk (survival_v3). Facility names and 'only hospital' status are CMS-derived facts. Scoped to general-acute hospitals (Acute Care, Critical Access, Rural Emergency), because a closed general hospital is what turns a county into a care desert. Specialty and federal facilities are excluded.

0.0 25.0 50.0 75.0 100.0 ASSUMPTION COMMUNITY HOSPITAL (LA) 80.9 CROSBYTON CLINIC HOSPITAL (TX) 78.6 WEBSTER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL (WV) 76.5 SAINT THOMAS HICKMAN HOSPITAL (TN) 51.8 REGIONAL WEST MEDICAL CENTER (NE) 51.7 ANSON GENERAL HOSPITAL (TX) 50.5 ASCENSION ST VINCENT SALEM (IN) 49.4 UNION HOSPITAL CLINTON (IN) 49.0 LAFOLLETTE MEDICAL CENTER (TN) 47.9 STONES RIVER HOSPITAL (TN) 47.1 JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL (MS) 46.1 CAMERON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER (MO) 46.1 FALLS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND CLINIC (TX) 45.2 GREENE COUNTY HOSPITAL (AL) 40.9 POINTE COUPEE GENERAL HOSPITAL (LA) 39.7
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
HospitalTypeStateCountyClosure riskNearest hospital (mi)Sole community
ASSUMPTION COMMUNITY HOSPITALRural Emergency HospitalLAASSUMPTION80.910.5yes
CROSBYTON CLINIC HOSPITALRural Emergency HospitalTXCROSBY78.637.3yes
WEBSTER MEMORIAL HOSPITALCAHWVWEBSTER76.523.8yes
SAINT THOMAS HICKMAN HOSPITALCAHTNHICKMAN51.823.9yes
REGIONAL WEST MEDICAL CENTERAcute CareNESCOTT BLUFF51.729.3yes
ANSON GENERAL HOSPITALRural Emergency HospitalTXJONES50.518.5yes
ASCENSION ST VINCENT SALEMCAHINWASHINGTON49.420.5yes
UNION HOSPITAL CLINTONCAHINVERMILLION4912.9yes
LAFOLLETTE MEDICAL CENTERAcute CareTNCAMPBELL47.923.8yes
STONES RIVER HOSPITALAcute CareTNCANNON47.115.7no
JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITALRural Emergency HospitalMSJEFFERSON46.118.5yes
CAMERON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERAcute CareMOCLINTON46.128.3no
FALLS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND CLINICRural Emergency HospitalTXFALLS45.222.8yes
GREENE COUNTY HOSPITALAcute CareALGREENE40.925.3no
POINTE COUPEE GENERAL HOSPITALCAHLAPOINTE COUPEE39.712.9yes
GENESIS MEDICAL CENTER, ALEDOCAHILMERCER37.419.9yes
ALLIANCE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INCAcute CareMSMARSHALL3622yes
MAGRUDER HOSPITALCAHOHOTTAWA34.925.8yes
VALLEY HEALTH WAR MEMORIAL HOSPITALCAHWVMORGAN33.414.7yes
TRISTAR ASHLAND CITY MEDICAL CENTERRural Emergency HospitalTNCHEATHAM33.217.5yes
ASCENSION BORGESS LEE HOSPITALCAHMICASS31.812.6yes
MEDINA MEMORIAL HOSPITALCAHNYORLEANS31.217yes
GRAFTON CITY HOSPITAL, INCCAHWVTAYLOR30.99.1yes
WILLIAMSON MEMORIAL INCAcute CareWVMINGO29.83.8yes
KALKASKA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTERCAHMIKALKASKA2921.8yes
ST ELIZABETH GRANTCAHKYGRANT28.721yes
PAUL OLIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITALCAHMIBENZIE28.626.7yes
SAINT MARY'S STANDISH COMMUNITY HOSPITALCAHMIARENAC28.426.5yes
ST BERNARDS FIVE RIVERS MEDICAL CENTERRural Emergency HospitalARRANDOLPH2820.4yes
ASCENSION ST VINCENT CLAYCAHINCLAY27.914.4yes
DAVIS MEDICAL CENTERAcute CareWVRANDOLPH27.720.8yes
ST CHARLES MEDICAL CENTER PRINEVILLECAHORCROOK26.527.3yes
WARM SPRINGS MEDICAL CENTERCAHGAMERIWETHER26.423yes
DICKENSON COMMUNITY HOSPITALCAHVADICKENSON26.422.1yes
BROADDUS HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INCCAHWVBARBOUR26.313.6yes
HOLMES COUNTY HOSPITAL AND CLINICSCAHMSHOLMES24.827.4yes
GOODALL WITCHER HOSPITALCAHTXBOSQUE24.126.5yes
SANFORD WHEATON MEDICAL CENTERCAHMNTRAVERSE23.618.2yes
MINNESOTA VALLEY HEALTH CENTER INCCAHMNLE SUEUR23.68.4yes
COBLESKILL REGIONAL HOSPITALCAHNYSCHOHARIE23.618.6yes

CMS Medicare patient-flow (HSA) + Care Compare + ACS/AHRF ecosystem pipelines · 2026-06-23 · source

Share of residents more than 60 minutes from a hospital, by state

Percent of each state's population beyond a 60-minute drive of the nearest open acute hospital.

Read it this way A rural-West story: Alaska (12.6%), New Mexico, Wyoming, the Dakotas, and Montana lead. Dense states sit near zero. Pick a state to spotlight it, and read it against the single-hospital-county map. A state dark on both is where distance and dependence compound. Use the single-hospital map to see where exposure concentrates, the closure-risk map and mix to see where failure is most likely, and the at-risk list to name the specific facilities. Then tie those to the recommended monitoring and support actions.

Caveat Drive time is a routed road-network isochrone (Valhalla over OpenStreetMap), so catchments follow real roads and speeds. See the methodology note.

AK 18.8% ME 2.0% WA 0.9% ID 2.2% MT 6.3% ND 1.7% MN 0.4% WI 0.1% MI 0.1% NY 0.1% VT 0.1% NH 0.3% OR 1.1% NV 1.3% WY 15.9% SD 4.1% IA 0.0% IL 0.0% IN 0.0% OH 0.0% PA 0.0% NJ 0.0% MA 0.1% CA 0.3% UT 1.0% CO 1.4% NE 0.2% MO 0.4% KY 0.0% WV 0.4% VA 0.1% MD 0.0% CT 0.0% RI 0.1% AZ 2.3% NM 4.9% KS 0.0% AR 0.2% TN 0.1% NC 0.1% SC 0.0% DC 0.0% DE 0.0% OK 0.1% LA 0.3% MS 0.0% AL 0.1% GA 0.0% TX 0.2% FL 0.1% HI 2.6% 0.0% 18.8%
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
State% beyond 60 minPeople beyond 60 minHospitals
AK18.83213811321
WY15.8869163627
MT6.3016831861
NM4.88810351240
SD4.143671157
HI2.5763748220
AZ2.33416695081
ID2.1673985643
ME2.012738031
ND1.7471360844
CO1.4078126583
NV1.3354144635
OR1.0594488357
UT1.0053287745
WA0.8626642984
WV0.417748346
MN0.38822130123
MO0.3572199297
NH0.307423425
PR0.3071010046
LA0.29613773110
CA0.283111814315
AR0.23691576
NE0.185363687
TX0.15444837380
VT0.14693914
WI0.1347889123
RI0.128141010
NC0.1251307699
MI0.12112167125
FL0.1225779180
OK0.1154571118
AL0.094470088
NY0.09118418150
MA0.082574559
TN0.078536595
VA0.058496478
KY0.041185088
GA0.0272872125
SC0.025129754
MS0.02471694
PA0.0243171149
MD0.019117843
OH0.0091069151
IL0.008985169
CT0025
DC006
DE006
IA00112
IN00115
KS00129
NJ0261

Valhalla 3.8.1 auto-costing isochrones over OpenStreetMap (Geofabrik US regional extracts, 2026-07-06 vintage); CMS hospital_master + provider_of_services (staffed beds); U.S. Census Bureau 2020 block-group population-weighted centroids · 2026-07-07 · source

If this hospital closed, who loses adequate access

People who would fall below the access-adequacy threshold if the named hospital closed (top 10).

Read it this way An E2SFCA model of who would fall below the access-adequacy threshold if a given hospital closed. Large metro hospitals hovering near the adequacy line top the list, not only rural ones (a reminder that access is a supply-vs-population ratio, not distance alone). Use the single-hospital map to see where exposure concentrates, the closure-risk map and mix to see where failure is most likely, and the at-risk list to name the specific facilities. Then tie those to the recommended monitoring and support actions.

Caveat E2SFCA closure-impact estimate built on the valhalla_isochrone drive-time model. It ranks people-at-risk, not certainty of loss.

0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 SHARP MEMORIAL HOSPITAL (CA) 1,825,774 SCRIPPS MERCY HOSPITAL (CA) 1,498,807 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS (CA) 1,438,414 KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL - S (CA) 1,409,465 UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HOSPITAL AN (UT) 1,348,807 SANTA CLARA VALLEY MEDICAL CEN (CA) 1,341,355 SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER (WA) 1,223,335 ST DAVID'S MEDICAL CENTER (TX) 1,188,411 KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL - S (CA) 1,142,379 METHODIST HOSPITAL (TX) 1,126,199
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
HospitalStatePeople at riskStaffed beds
SHARP MEMORIAL HOSPITALCA1825774881
SCRIPPS MERCY HOSPITALCA1498807700
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS MEDICAL CENTERCA1438414631
KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL - SACRAMENTOCA1409465628
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HOSPITAL AND CLINICSUT13488071013
SANTA CLARA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTERCA13413551337
SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTERWA1223335697
ST DAVID'S MEDICAL CENTERTX1188411625
KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL - SAN DIEGOCA1142379659
METHODIST HOSPITALTX11261992465
MEMORIAL HERMANN HOSPITAL SYSTEMTX11039681515
LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITALPA1096467996
SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER, SACRAMENTOCA1090810523
SPECTRUM HEALTHMI10849511135
UC SAN DIEGO HEALTH HILLCREST - HILLCREST MED CTRCA1064466600

Valhalla 3.8.1 auto-costing isochrones over OpenStreetMap (Geofabrik US regional extracts, 2026-07-06 vintage); CMS hospital_master + provider_of_services (staffed beds); U.S. Census Bureau 2020 block-group population-weighted centroids · 2026-07-07 · source

Why this matters

Federal payment rewards volume and scale, which structurally disadvantages the low-volume hospitals that are the only option for their catchment. Closures are reported after the fact, so support arrives too late. The data to predict them (financial distress, quality, isolation, market structure) already exists and is not being used as a watchlist.

Recommended actions

  • Build a state-level watchlist from the at-risk list: the only-hospital-in-county facilities with the highest modeled closure risk are the ones to monitor first.
  • Pre-position Rural Emergency Hospital conversion and sole-community-provider payment support for the highest-risk facilities before they fail, not after.
  • Pair the closure-risk map with the single-hospital map: prioritize states that score high on both, where a closure is both likely and leaves no fallback.
  • Treat the modeled score as a trigger for a human financial review, not as an automatic verdict: confirm distress before acting.

The recommendation

Therefore, run a closure early-warning function on the single-hospital communities. Rank sole-provider hospitals by modeled closure risk, watch the highest-risk facilities in your state, and move support upstream of the closure so no community loses all local care with no warning.

Demographic slice Facility level, national. 'Only hospital in county' and 'sole community provider' are CMS-derived flags. Flow-based catchment marks hospitals whose Medicare patients use essentially no other facility. Closure risk is modeled from financial, quality, and ecosystem features.

Sources