off label.
Filters
State
Payer
charts re-slice where a pre-computed view exists

Legislation & rulemaking

How much law and regulation is the system digesting at once?

Right now the pipeline holds 117 health bills in the 119th Congress, 1,271 state health bills across 51 states (447 already passed), and 1,058 CMS/HHS Federal Register documents published since January 2026, plus 35,877 certificate-of-need filings that decide, state by state, who may even build or buy healthcare capacity. Every layer moves on its own clock, and providers must track all of them at once.

Question

The problem

Health policy is moving through a multi-layered regulatory landscape that no hospital, payer, or advocacy team can track manually. Bills, rules, state legislation, and certificate-of-need filings operate on different clocks, and attention often goes to the loudest political signal rather than the binding rule or live comment window.

The recommendation

Stand up a policy-intelligence operating model that ranks work by binding effect and deadline. The recommended approach is to prioritize Federal Register rules by reach, track state legislative movement where it affects operations, calendar comment windows, and treat congressional bill volume as an agenda signal rather than an action queue.

117
federal health bills
119th Congress, keyword-matched
1,271
state health bills
51 states · 447 passed
1,058
CMS/HHS Federal Register docs
since Jan 2026 · 22 significant
35,877
certificate-of-need filings
12 states ingested · 616 pending

How far federal health bills actually get

119th Congress health bills by the furthest legislative stage each reached. Committee is where most bills end.

Read it this way Every one of the 117 health bills was introduced, but only 2 became law. The rest stall in committee. Read federal bill counts as an agenda signal, not as pending law. Use this chart to identify which policy layer is active and whether it creates binding operational risk, then connect that evidence to the recommendation to prioritize rules, deadlines, and state action.

0 50 100 150 200 Introduced 117 Referred to committee 104 Enacted into law 2
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
Stage reachedBills
Introduced117
Referred to committee104
Enacted into law2

Congress.gov API, 119th Congress health-keyword bills · 2026-06-18 · source

How far state health bills actually get

State health bills by furthest stage reached (LegiScan status at last action). 122 failed or were vetoed.

Read it this way Of 1,271 state health bills introduced, 447 passed into law and 122 failed or were vetoed. A state bill that clears a chamber usually goes the distance, unlike its federal counterpart. Use this chart to identify which policy layer is active and whether it creates binding operational risk, then connect that evidence to the recommendation to prioritize rules, deadlines, and state action.

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Introduced 1,271 Passed a chamber 598 Enacted into law 447
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
Stage reachedBills
Introduced1271
Passed a chamber598
Enacted into law447

LegiScan, state health bills (51 states) · 2026-06-27 · source

Federal rulemaking never idles

CMS + HHS documents published in the Federal Register per month, 2026. Most are notices. The rules and proposed rules are the ones that change payment and coverage.

Read it this way The flat, high baseline is the point: rulemaking never pauses for the legislative calendar. Pick Medicare or Medicaid in the payer filter to isolate the documents that mention that program. The shape barely changes, which tells you program-specific rules ride a constant conveyor. Use this chart to identify which policy layer is active and whether it creates binding operational risk, then connect that evidence to the recommendation to prioritize rules, deadlines, and state action.

0 63 125 188 250 2026-012026-022026-032026-042026-052026-06 Documents
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
MonthDocuments
2026-01104
2026-02207
2026-03191
2026-04223
2026-05194
2026-06139

Federal Register API, CMS + HHS documents · 2026-06-18 · source

§ methodology
Source
Federal Register API, documents filed by CMS and HHS
Vintage
2026
Denominator
All Federal Register documents (rules, proposed rules, notices) whose filing agency is CMS or HHS, January 2026 onward.
Known caveats
  • Counts documents, not regulatory weight. One omnibus rule can matter more than fifty notices.
  • Agency attribution follows the Federal Register agency slug, and joint documents count once.
Filters
TimeFilter
Citation
Office of the Federal Register, federalregister.gov API, CMS/HHS documents, 2026. Accessed via HealthPulse ingest.
Updated
2026-06-18

What the Federal Register flow is made of

Documents by type. Notices dominate. The ~10% that are rules or proposed rules carry the binding changes.

Read it this way Divide before you panic: 947 of 1,058 documents are notices with no binding force. The rules plus proposed rules, about one in ten, are the set worth reading, and the impact ranking below sorts those by reach. Use this chart to identify which policy layer is active and whether it creates binding operational risk, then connect that evidence to the recommendation to prioritize rules, deadlines, and state action.

0 250 500 750 1,000 Notice 947 Rule 67 Proposed Rule 44
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
Document typeCount
Notice947
Rule67
Proposed Rule44

Federal Register API, CMS + HHS documents · 2026-06-18 · source

The rules touching the most hospitals

Federal Register documents ranked by the number of hospitals their provisions apply to, per the HealthPulse policy-impact screen. National data-reporting requirements reach the entire universe of ~5,400 facilities at once.

Read it this way Reach concentrates at the top: a handful of program-wide requirements touch all ~5,400 hospitals at once while most documents touch narrow slices. Prioritize by the hospital count on the bar, not by how alarming the title sounds. Use this chart to identify which policy layer is active and whether it creates binding operational risk, then connect that evidence to the recommendation to prioritize rules, deadlines, and state action.

Caveat Applicability is a screening estimate from document text (hospital types + programs named), not a legal determination.

0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission… 5,426 Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Test… 5,426 Watson Laboratories, Inc., et al.; Withdrawal of App… 5,426 Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission… 5,262 Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed C… 5,262 Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission… 5,262 Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed C… 5,262 Medicare and Medicaid Programs; CY 2026 Payment Poli… 5,262 Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed C… 5,262 Effective Date of Requirement for Premarket Approval… 5,262
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
DocumentHospitals affectedExposure weightPublished
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Public Comment Request; Health Work542637.352026-03-16
Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs-Authorized Testing Panels5426130.712026-03-13
Watson Laboratories, Inc., et al.; Withdrawal of Approval of 15 Abbreviated New Drug Applications542637.352026-03-12
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request526259.542026-03-18
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request526259.542026-03-18
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request526259.542026-03-17
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request526259.542026-03-17
Medicare and Medicaid Programs; CY 2026 Payment Policies Under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Changes to Part B Pa5262238.162026-03-12
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request526259.542026-03-11
Effective Date of Requirement for Premarket Approval Applications for Blood Irradiators Intended To Prevent Metastasis526266.982026-03-18

Federal Register API, CMS + HHS documents · 2026-06-18 · source

State health bills in play, by state

Health-tagged bills per state legislature in the current sessions. Bluer is more, and big legislatures (CA, NY, TX) file more of everything.

Read it this way Big legislatures file more of everything, so compare neighbors, not CA against WY. Pick Medicare or Medicaid in the payer filter to re-slice the map to those bills only, and pick a state to spotlight its cell. Use this chart to identify which policy layer is active and whether it creates binding operational risk, then connect that evidence to the recommendation to prioritize rules, deadlines, and state action.

AK 20 ME 20 WA 20 ID 20 MT 20 ND 20 MN 20 WI 20 MI 20 NY 52 VT 20 NH 20 OR 20 NV 20 WY 20 SD 20 IA 20 IL 50 IN 20 OH 52 PA 55 NJ 20 MA 20 CA 51 UT 20 CO 20 NE 20 MO 20 KY 20 WV 20 VA 20 MD 20 CT 20 RI 20 AZ 20 NM 20 KS 20 AR 20 TN 20 NC 21 SC 20 DC 20 DE 20 OK 20 LA 20 MS 20 AL 20 GA 50 TX 50 FL 50 HI 20 0 55
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
StateHealth bills
PA55
NY52
OH52
CA51
FL50
GA50
IL50
TX50
NC21
AK20
AL20
AR20
AZ20
CO20
CT20
DC20
DE20
HI20
IA20
ID20
IN20
KS20
KY20
LA20
MA20
MD20
ME20
MI20
MN20
MO20
MS20
MT20
ND20
NE20
NH20
NJ20
NM20
NV20
OK20
OR20
RI20
SC20
SD20
TN20
UT20
VA20
VT20
WA20
WI20
WV20
WY20

LegiScan, state health bills (51 states) · 2026-06-27 · source

§ methodology
Source
LegiScan national API, bills matching health-policy tags
Vintage
2025-2026
Denominator
Bills in current state legislative sessions tagged to a health-policy topic, all 50 states + DC.
Known caveats
  • Tagging is keyword-driven, so narrowly-scoped bills (single-facility resolutions) count the same as omnibus reform.
  • Session calendars differ by state, so cross-state counts compare different time windows.
Filters
GeographyFilterTimeFilter
Citation
LegiScan LLC, LegiScan API national dataset, 2025-2026 sessions. Accessed via HealthPulse ingest, 2026.
Updated
2026-06-27

What state bills are about

Top health-policy topics across all state bills. Mental health leads by a wide margin.

Read it this way Mental health leads by a wide margin across 51 legislatures, a genuine national wave rather than one big state's agenda. Medicaid/Medicare is second: states are not waiting for Washington on either. Use this chart to identify which policy layer is active and whether it creates binding operational risk, then connect that evidence to the recommendation to prioritize rules, deadlines, and state action.

0 125 250 375 500 Mental health 353 Medicaid medicare 249 Nursing 173 Hospital finance 172 Insurance access 103 Public health 61 Prescription drugs 60 General 59 Telehealth 41
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
TopicBills
Mental health353
Medicaid medicare249
Nursing173
Hospital finance172
Insurance access103
Public health61
Prescription drugs60
General59
Telehealth41

LegiScan, state health bills (51 states) · 2026-06-27 · source

What Congress's health bills mention

Keyword matches across the 117 health bills (a bill can match several keywords). Medicare and Medicaid dominate, as they fund most of the system.

Read it this way Medicare and Medicaid top the keyword counts because that is where federal money is. A bill can match several keywords. Pair this with the status reality in the bill list: nearly nine in ten of these bills sit in committee. Use this chart to identify which policy layer is active and whether it creates binding operational risk, then connect that evidence to the recommendation to prioritize rules, deadlines, and state action.

0 13 25 38 50 Medicare 30 Medicaid 18 Health 12 Patient 12 Hospital 10 Cancer 10 Drug 9 Health care 9 Public health 9 Mental health 8 Diabetes 5 Medical 5
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
KeywordBills
medicare30
medicaid18
health12
patient12
hospital10
cancer10
drug9
health care9
public health9
mental health8
diabetes5
medical5

Congress.gov API, 119th Congress health-keyword bills · 2026-06-18 · source

Certificate-of-need filings per year

CON applications in the ingested states. In these states a hospital cannot add beds, buy an MRI, or change owners without one. Each filing is mandatory paperwork before capacity can move.

Read it this way The volume is steady and boring, and that is the finding: CON is routine, mandatory throughput, not a policy cycle. Pick one of the 12 ingested states to see its own filing rhythm. NY dominates the combined total. Use this chart to identify which policy layer is active and whether it creates binding operational risk, then connect that evidence to the recommendation to prioritize rules, deadlines, and state action.

Caveat Covers the 12 states with ingested portals (NY alone is 88% of filings). Roughly 35 states run CON programs, so this undercounts the national total.

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2015201720192021202320252026 Filings
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
Year filedFilings
2015744
20161093
2017911
2018913
2019892
2020805
2021683
2022960
2023877
2024809
2025772
2026462

State certificate-of-need (CON) portals · 2026-06-27 · source

What CON filings ask permission for

Filings by project type across the ingested states. New construction dominates, with ownership changes and expansion next.

Read it this way New construction leads with 10,674 filings, nearly three times the 3,461 ownership changes: CON programs are primarily gatekeeping capacity expansion, not consolidation. Pick a state to see its own mix. States differ sharply in what they make providers ask permission for. Use this chart to identify which policy layer is active and whether it creates binding operational risk, then connect that evidence to the recommendation to prioritize rules, deadlines, and state action.

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 New construction 10,674 Change of ownership 3,461 Expansion 3,309 Equipment 1,181 Relocation 1,145 Closure 796 Service 154 Change of scope 52 Nursing facility 25
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
Project typeFilings
New construction10674
Change of ownership3461
Expansion3309
Equipment1181
Relocation1145
Closure796
Service154
Change of scope52
Nursing facility25

State certificate-of-need (CON) portals · 2026-06-27 · source

Comment periods closing next

Open CMS/HHS comment periods, soonest deadline first. Public comment is the one formal lever anyone outside the agencies has on a rule before it binds.

Read it this way Each row is a live, dated lever: public comment is the one formal input anyone outside the agencies has before a rule binds. Pick a payer to keep only windows whose titles name that program. After the close date the next lever is litigation. Use this chart to identify which policy layer is active and whether it creates binding operational risk, then connect that evidence to the recommendation to prioritize rules, deadlines, and state action.

2026-07-10 Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request centers for medicare medicaid services 2026-07-10 Agency Information Collection Request; 60-Day Public Comment Request health and human services department 2026-07-10 Fiscal Year 2026 Generic Drug Science and Research Initiatives Workshop; Public Workshop; Request for Comments health and human services department 2026-07-13 Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Annual Report on Households Assisted by the Low Income Home Energ health and human services department 2026-07-13 Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Public Comment Request; Delta State health and human services department 2026-07-13 Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Pilot Evaluation health and human services department 2026-07-13 Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Proced health and human services department 2026-07-13 Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Establ health and human services department 2026-07-13 Drug Repurposing for Unmet Medical Needs; Request for Information; Extension of Comment Period health and human services department 2026-07-13 Recommendations on Scale-Up and Postapproval Changes Guidances for Industry; Request for Comments; Reopening of the Comm health and human services department
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
ClosesDocumentAgency
2026-07-10Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Requestcenters-for-medicare-medicaid-services
2026-07-10Agency Information Collection Request; 60-Day Public Comment Requesthealth-and-human-services-department
2026-07-10Fiscal Year 2026 Generic Drug Science and Research Initiatives Workshop; Public Workshop; Request for Commentshealth-and-human-services-department
2026-07-13Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Annual Report on Households Assisted by the Low Income Home Energhealth-and-human-services-department
2026-07-13Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Public Comment Request; Delta Statehealth-and-human-services-department
2026-07-13Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Pilot Evaluationhealth-and-human-services-department
2026-07-13Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Procedhealth-and-human-services-department
2026-07-13Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Establhealth-and-human-services-department
2026-07-13Drug Repurposing for Unmet Medical Needs; Request for Information; Extension of Comment Periodhealth-and-human-services-department
2026-07-13Recommendations on Scale-Up and Postapproval Changes Guidances for Industry; Request for Comments; Reopening of the Commhealth-and-human-services-department

Federal Register API, CMS + HHS documents · 2026-06-18 · source

The newest federal health bills

Most recently introduced health bills in the 119th Congress. Almost all sit in committee: that is where most bills end.

Read it this way Almost everything here is headed for committee, where most bills end. Read sponsors and topics as a signal of next session's agenda, not as pending law. Filter by state to see your delegation's bills, or by payer to keep Medicare/Medicaid bills only. Use this chart to identify which policy layer is active and whether it creates binding operational risk, then connect that evidence to the recommendation to prioritize rules, deadlines, and state action.

2026-05-21 Rural Hospital Revitalization Act of 2026 Rep. Tokuda, Jill N. [D-HI-2] (D-HI) 2026-03-19 Rural Hospital Revitalization Act of 2026 Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO] (D-CO) National Diabetes Project Act Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027 Healthy Start Reauthorization Act of 2026 NIH IMPROVE Act Mental Health Access and Provider Support Act of 2026 Access to Prescription Digital Therapeutics Act of 2025 Expanding Seniors Access to Mental Health Services Act WWII Nurses Congressional Gold Medal Act
⊞ data table⬇ CSV
IntroducedBillSponsor
2026-05-21Rural Hospital Revitalization Act of 2026Rep. Tokuda, Jill N. [D-HI-2] (D-HI)
2026-03-19Rural Hospital Revitalization Act of 2026Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO] (D-CO)
National Diabetes Project Act
Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027
Healthy Start Reauthorization Act of 2026
NIH IMPROVE Act
Mental Health Access and Provider Support Act of 2026
Access to Prescription Digital Therapeutics Act of 2025
Expanding Seniors Access to Mental Health Services Act
WWII Nurses Congressional Gold Medal Act

Congress.gov API, 119th Congress health-keyword bills · 2026-06-18 · source

Why this matters

Rulemaking is the channel where payment and coverage actually change, and it never pauses for the legislative calendar. Bill counts are sentiment data. Committee is where most bills end. Attention allocated by headline volume therefore lands on the wrong layer, and comment windows, the one cheap formal lever, expire unused.

Recommended actions

  • Prioritize the Federal Register documents ranked by hospitals affected. A handful of program-wide requirements carry most of the binding reach.
  • Put every relevant open comment deadline on a calendar. After it closes the next lever is litigation.
  • Assign one owner per layer (federal rules, own-state legislature, CON, Congress) instead of one team reading everything.
  • Treat congressional bill counts as a leading indicator of next session's agenda, never as pending law.

The recommendation

Therefore, stand up a policy-intelligence operating model that ranks work by binding effect and deadline. The recommended approach is to prioritize Federal Register rules by reach, track state legislative movement where it affects operations, calendar comment windows, and treat congressional bill volume as an agenda signal rather than an action queue.

Demographic slice none at the bill level. Federal bills are keyword-matched to health topics, and state bills come from LegiScan's health tagging. CON filings cover the 12 states whose portals are ingested so far, not all ~35 CON states.

Sources